Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green and Pink | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 90.5 score against 77.8. Despite of the fact Xperia 5 III is older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still way lighter. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Xperia 5 III has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xperia 5 III, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a much bigger display and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The Xperia 5 III counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Xperia 5 III, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Xperia 5 III counts with a bit bigger storage for apps and games than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery duration than Xperia 5 III, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.