Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-05-23 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is much better than the Xperia X's 72.9 score. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel XL has a bit sharper display than Xperia X, because it has a quite better number of pixels per screen inch, a bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel XL has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia X, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel XL features a bit superior processor than Xperia X, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM.
The Sony Xperia X counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, a 0.43 inches back camera sensor and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also has a much higher resolution back camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Google Pixel XL counts with improved battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity against 2620mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia X. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xperia X, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.