Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is much better than Sony Xperia XA1, getting a overall score of 79.7 against 71.7. The Moto G Stylus body is way newer than the Sony Xperia XA1's, although it's heavier and thicker. The Sony Xperia XA1 features a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Moto G Stylus has a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a greater display density, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2300 and a bigger screen. Moto G Stylus counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Xperia XA1, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G Stylus features a better camera than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Moto G Stylus has a much longer battery duration than Xperia XA1, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a bit more expensive than Xperia XA1, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.