Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XA1, getting a score of 77.8 against 71.7. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is noticeably heavier than Sony Xperia XA1, it's noticeably thinner and also extremely newer. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Xperia XA1, because it has a way bigger screen, a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XA1, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Sony Xperia XA1 counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Xperia XA1, because it has a 148% greater battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xperia XA1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia XA1. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xperia XA1, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.