Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Xperia XZ3, getting a score of 87.1 against 79.6. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit heavier than Xperia XZ3, it's somewhat thinner and also a lot newer.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than Xperia XZ3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot worse pixel density, it also counts with a much brighter screen and a little bit larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xperia XZ3 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much larger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 35% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.