Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-17 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ3 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a score of 79.6 against 77. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Sony Xperia XZ3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Even being the best in this review, Sony Xperia XZ3 is a a lot thicker and a little heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures clearer photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features more storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xperia XZ3 features a very superior battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.