Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ3, with a overall score of 91.1 against 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is a lot newer, thinner and a bit lighter than Sony Xperia XZ3. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xperia XZ3 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Galaxy A52s counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ3, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A52s has better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Galaxy A52s has a better camera than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.