Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Xperia XZ3, with an 81.2 score against 79.6. Although Galaxy Note 3 is older than the Xperia XZ3, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cores and a larger amount of RAM. Xperia XZ3 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of screen, a much higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Xperia XZ3 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xperia XZ3 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xperia XZ3 shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xperia XZ3 also has a back-facing camera with way more MP, a bigger aperture and a much larger sensor.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3330mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.