Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ3's global score of 79.6. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is newer and thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Xperia XZ3.
The Xperia XZ3 has a better display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater display density. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a processing unit that's very similar to the CPU in Xperia XZ3, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xperia XZ3 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has superior battery performance than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.