Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than Sony Xperia XZ3, having a 94.8 score against 79.6. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction is newer, somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ3.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia XZ3 features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit worse screen pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Galaxy S20 features a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a way bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy S20 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 counts with longer battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a bit more expensive than Sony Xperia XZ3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.