Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ3's 79.6 general score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction has the same thickness than the Xperia XZ3, but it's somewhat heavier.
The Xperia XZ3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xperia XZ3 features a better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better display pixels density.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro and Xperia XZ3 count with really similar memory for apps and games, both have equal 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features superior battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.