Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the Sony Xperia Z2a, getting a overall score of 78.3 against 73. The vivo X70 Pro construction is somewhat heavier but thinner than the Sony Xperia Z2a. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the vivo X70 Pro has the older 11 version and Sony Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Xperia Z2a features a better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the display. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z2a, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a greater camera than Xperia Z2a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better resolution back camera and better video frame rates.
The vivo X70 Pro features a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z2a, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.