Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is much better than the TCL 20 5G, with an 84.5 score against 73.1. IPhone XS Max's design is thinner than TCL 20 5G, although it's just a bit heavier and was released many years before. The iPhone XS Max has a bit better display than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter display, a little higher display pixel density and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
IPhone XS Max has a superior processor than TCL 20 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. TCL 20 5G features a much better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The TCL 20 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. The TCL 20 5G has a superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.