Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. IPhone XR is an older phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Apple was able to build it a little lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better looking display than iPhone XR, because it has a way greater screen pixel density, a way higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, much more brightness and a quite bigger screen.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone XR features a very superior processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a very superior camera than iPhone XR, because it has a much higher resolution back camera, a bigger aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.