Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 516 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a score of 92.1, which is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. Both of these phones include the same Android 14 OS. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much faster processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit better screen than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count per inch of display and a bit worse 1280 x 2800 resolution, and they both have a same size display, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also counts with a much brighter screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with just a little bit longer battery life than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 5100mAh.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes a little bit better photos and videos than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a same resolution camera, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.