Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. The HTC One M9 is an extremely older and somewhat thicker cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but HTC was able to make it incredibly lighter anyway. These devices work with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better display than HTC One M9, because it has a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a really bigger display. The HTC One M9 counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics processor.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better storage to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a much larger back camera sensor, a much larger aperture to capture better low light images, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with lot more MP.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.