Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. Even though the HTC U Ultra is noticeably older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better display than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit greater count of pixels in each display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra has a much faster CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 70% greater battery size. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way higher video definition, a lot bigger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.