Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting an 81.3 score against 71.5. LG V35 ThinQ is an notably older cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is a lot lighter and thinner anyway. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a greater camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, it also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.