Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version, giving lots of additional features and a performance increase. Moto Z3 is an noticeably older cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is way lighter and extremely thinner anyway.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a quite larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Moto Z3 features a better memory capacity for games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 has a much greater hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.