Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a overall score of 80 against 71.5. The Motorola One Zoom construction is a little lighter than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it's a little thicker and was released 4 years before. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a higher count of pixels per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola One Zoom has an extremely better processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with longer battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 28% bigger battery size. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a better resolution camera in the back, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.