Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a general score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. Despite of the fact that the Nokia 9 PureView is much older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and lighter. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a much faster processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a lot better video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor, a camera with a much better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 54% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.