Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a 79.9 score against 71.5. These phones have the same Android 14 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a a little bit thinner and a bit lighter phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has way more screen brightness, a bit larger display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher pixels number per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a larger aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.