Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Galaxy A51's construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A51, because it has a greater number of pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A51 has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 28% greater battery size.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with a higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.