Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's overall score of 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a better pixel density, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.