Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 (2018) has a global score of 79.2, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. The Galaxy A8 (2018) is an noticeably older cellphone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Samsung made it lighter and just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a lot better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a bigger display, a quite higher pixels quantity per display inch and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a camera with a way higher resolution and a much better video definition.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.