Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy M20's body is a little bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a quite bigger display, a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy M20 counts with a much greater performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy M20, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.