Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a 77.7 score against 71.5. The Galaxy Note3 design is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it was released many years before. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note3 has a newer 4.4.2 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a much more powerful processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, because it has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos, a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.