Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a score of 79.5 against 71.5. Galaxy Note7's construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released 7 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 lesser cpu cores (although faster).
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy Note7, because it has a bit better display density, a larger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot better video quality, a camera with much more MP and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 46 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.