Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a global score of 83 against 71.5. The Galaxy Note8 is a a little bit lighter device than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but both of them are 0.34inches thick. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14, giving you a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a way higher video definition and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 55 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.