Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is way better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 overall score. The Galaxy S10 construction is notably lighter and a little thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much more powerful processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition, a lot larger sensor and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.