Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is way better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G construction is a little lighter and a little thinner than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released 5 years before.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a way better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a quite bigger screen and a little bit better screen pixels density.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light situations, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has as much memory for games and applications as the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.