Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is extremely lighter and just a bit thinner. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has older 13 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Galaxy S20 has a really superior performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a better display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a quite lower pixels quantity in each display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 3200, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also counts with a bit bigger display.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy S20 has a greater storage to store more games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.