Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has an overall score of 82.2, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also an extremely older, somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a very superior CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro and the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium have really similar displays, because although the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has much less brightness and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features more storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3540mAh. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution, a way larger sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.