Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v has a score of 78.8, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. These phones come with Android OS, but the Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. Xperia Z4v is a noticeably lighter phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but both of them are equally thin.
The Xperia Z4v has a much better hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 13 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a much larger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better camera than Xperia Z4v, because it has a lot better video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a much better 50 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.