Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a general score of 77.5, which is a bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's overall score of 71.5. Xiaomi Mi Max 2's design is thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's a little bit heavier and was released 7 years before. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little bigger display, a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better pixels quantity per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a way better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a way bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a bit longer battery duration than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.