Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a general score of 81.6 against 71.5. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also way older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has way more brightness, a greater pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a battery life that is very similar to the vivo iQOO 12 Pro one, although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 5100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.