Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Asus ROG Phone's general score of 77.1. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a little bit heavier than the Asus ROG Phone, it's thinner and also notably newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a little higher pixel density, a much bigger display, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and much more brightness.
The Asus ROG Phone counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Asus ROG Phone and vivo X Fold 3 Pro count with similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have the same 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Asus ROG Phone, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Asus ROG Phone. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Asus ROG Phone, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.