Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a score of 87.4, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also way older, just a little heavier and incredibly thicker. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper display than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because it has a much brighter screen, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro and Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition both have quite similar cameras, because although the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations and a much smaller sensor taking much worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, it also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a little better battery life than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.