Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s general score of 77.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a extremely newer and noticeably thinner phone than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), although it's also somewhat heavier. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has Android 11.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a larger display, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture, a camera in the back with a higher resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.