Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting a general score of 77.8 against 77. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is much newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Honor 50 Pro.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a bigger display. Honor 50 Pro has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot higher video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.