Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.93 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Brown, Gold and Pink |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 239.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 498 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 730 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 10 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 78.9 against 77.8. These devices work with Android operating system, but Huawei Mate 10 has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Huawei Mate 10 is an a lot older and thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Huawei was able to build it lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much bigger screen, a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and much more brightness. The Huawei Mate 10 has a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 10, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Huawei Mate 10 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.