Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.23 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 519.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2244 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 383 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 820 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 20 has an overall score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. These phones work with Android OS, but Huawei Mate 20 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Huawei Mate 20 is a way older and noticeably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Huawei managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The Huawei Mate 20 features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Huawei Mate 20, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a lot brighter screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Huawei Mate 20, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery life than Huawei Mate 20, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Huawei Mate 20, because it has a larger aperture, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Huawei Mate 20 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.