Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-01-10 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 775.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 78.7 score against 77.8. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro construction is much lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is incredibly thicker and was released 7 years before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Huawei Mate 9 Pro has 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way larger screen. Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has a way better video quality, a much larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has a 43% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Huawei Mate 9 Pro is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.