Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Red and White |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than LG K52, having a general score of 77.8 against 76. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a notably newer and way thinner cellphone than LG K52, although it's also heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version while LG K52 has Android 10.
LG K52 counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than LG K52, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger display and a lot more pixels per screen inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG K52, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than LG K52, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than LG K52, because it has a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.