Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a global score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has 5.1 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though LG V10 is notably older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking display than LG V10, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution. LG V10 features a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less cores and 12 GB lesser RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG V10, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 90 percent bigger battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than LG V10, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V10 is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.