Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 77.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact the Motorola Edge 20 Lite is way older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a larger display and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a camera that is very similar to the vivo X Fold 3 Pro one, because although the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, it also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rate and a way better resolution back camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.