Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Nokia XR20 design is a lot older, thicker and noticeably heavier than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but Nokia XR20 has 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Nokia XR20 counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a little bit higher screen pixel density, a larger screen and a lot brighter display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features improved battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior camera than Nokia XR20, because it has a lot bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a back-facing camera with more MP, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia XR20 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.