Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A22's 76.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a incredibly newer and way thinner cellphone than Galaxy A22, although it is also heavier.
Galaxy A22 has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a larger display, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.