Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), with a general score of 77.8 against 75.8. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a incredibly newer and way thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is also heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way bigger screen.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way higher video resolution, a camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.