Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a way older and noticeably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it lighter anyway.
The Galaxy A52s has a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a quite greater pixels amount in each screen inch, a larger screen and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.